KNAW

Publication

Detection of minimal residual disease identifies differences... (2002) Open access

Pagina-navigatie:
Title Detection of minimal residual disease identifies differences in treatment response between T-ALL and precursor B-ALL
Published in Blood. ISSN 0006-4971.
Author Willemse, M.J.; Hop, W.C.J. (Wim); Panzer-Grumayer, E.R.; Biondi, A. (Andrea); Dongen, van J.J.M. (Jacques); Schrappe, M.; Kamps, W.A. (Willem); Bartram, C.R. (Claus); Masera, G.; Riehm, H.; Gadner, H.; Seriu, T.; Hettinger, K.; Aniello, d' E.
Date 2002-01-01
Language English
Type article
Abstract We performed sensitive polymerase chain reaction-based minimal residual disease (MRD) analyses on bone marrow samples at 9 follow-up time points in 71 children with T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and compared the results with the precursor B-lineage ALL (B-ALL) results (n = 210) of our previous study. At the first 5 follow-up time points, the frequency of MRD-positive patients and the MRD levels were higher in T-ALL than in precursor-B-ALL, reflecting the more frequent occurrence of resistant disease in T-ALL. Subsequently, patients were classified according to their MRD level at time point 1 (TP1), taken at the end of induction treatment (5 weeks), and at TP2 just before the start of consolidation treatment (3 months). Patients were considered at low risk if TP1 and TP2 were MRD negative and at high risk if MRD levels at TP1 and TP2 were 10(-3) or higher; remaining patients were considered at intermediate risk. The relative distribution of patients with T-ALL (n = 43) over the MRD-based risk groups differed significantly from that of precursor B-ALL (n = 109). Twenty-three percent of patients with T-ALL and 46% of patients with precursor B-ALL were classified in the low-risk group (P =.01) and had a 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate of 98% or greater. In contrast, 28% of patients with T-ALL were classified in the MRD-based high-risk group compared to only 11% of patients with precursor B-ALL (P =.02), and the RFS rates were 0% and 25%, respectively (P =.03). Not only was the distribution of patients with T-ALL different over the MRD-based risk groups, the prognostic value of MRD levels at TP1 and TP2 was higher in T-ALL (larger RFS gradient), and consistently higher RFS rates were found for MRD-negative T-ALL patients at the first 5 follow-up time points.
Publication http://hdl.handle.net/1765/8166
Persistent Identifier urn:NBN:nl:ui:15-1765/8166
Metadata XML
Repository Erasmus University Rotterdam
Erasmus University Rotterdam

Go to page top
Go back to contents
Go back to site navigation