| Abstract |
The advent of a growing share of small firms in modern economies
raises some intriguing questions. The most intriguing question
undoubtedly is why so many smaller firms, which have traditionally
been classified as sub-optimal scale firms, can exist. We suggest that,
through pursuing a strategy of compensating factor differentials, that
is by remunerating and deploying factors of production differently
than their larger counterparts, small firms are able to compensate for
size-inherent cost disadvantages. Using a sample of over seven thousand
Dutch manufacturing firms, we find considerable evidence that
such a strategy of compensating factor differentials is pursued within
a European context. When viewed through a static lens, the existence
of such a strategy, while making small and sub-optimal scale
firms viable, suggests that they impose a net welfare loss on the
economy. However, when viewed through a dynamic lens, the findings
of a positive relationship between firm age and employee compensation
as well as firm age and firm productivity suggest that there
may be at least a tendency for the inefficient firm of today to become
the efficient firm of tomorrow.
5
Are Small Firms Really Sub-Optimal? |