KNAW

Research

The Greek perfect and discourse cohesion

Pagina-navigatie:


Update content


Title The Greek perfect and discourse cohesion
Period 09 / 2010 - unknown
Status Current
Dissertation Yes
Research number OND1342495
Data Supplier Website OIKOS

Abstract

Cohesion can be described as the explicit indication of textual coherence by means of linguistic devices. One of these devices is the use of different tenses: tenses help to structuralize the discourse (text) by locating individual States of Affairs in time and relating them to each other on various levels. These levels can vary between the individual sentence (micro level) and the wider context of the discourse. A well-known example of this structuralizing use of tenses is the alternation of imperfects and aorists in Greek narrative texts: the imperfects create a frame (have a backgrounding function) for the aorists, which, in turn, mark the successive steps in the narrative (see e.g. Rijksbaron (2002: 11-14)). Unfortunately (and surprisingly) the attention paid to the cohesive force of Greek tenses is virtually limited to the narrative tenses (viz. aorist, imperfect and historical present). The perfect has not been analyzed from this specific viewpoint and generally speaking is treated quite stepmotherly in the literature. In my contribution to the 6th International Colloquium on Ancient Greek Linguistics I will focus on the use of the perfect in various (non-narrative) texts and argue that the commonly accepted description of the Greek perfect needs refinements. Moreover, I will attempt to show that the perfect functions as a cohesive device on various discourse levels. The communis opinio about the semantic value of the perfect can be resumed as follows: the perfect stem signifies both that a state of affairs is completed and that as a result a state exists (stative-confective value); the primary perfect indicative (commonly: perfect) locates the state at the moment of utterance (the present ) (Rijksbaron (2002: 1;4); cf. e.g. Ruijgh (1971: 229-30); Rijksbaron (1984: 403-4)). This definition is however rather unsatisfactory for a large number of perfects. In many cases, the idea of a resulting state is inapplicable, or forced at the very least.

Related organisations

Related people

Supervisor Prof.dr. G.C. Wakker
Doctoral/PhD student S.A.J. Orriens (MA)

Related research (upper level)


Go to page top
Go back to contents
Go back to site navigation