<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><mods xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" version="3.2" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-2.xsd"><titleInfo><title>Efficacy of a physical therapy program in patients with Parkinson&apos;s disease: a randomized controlled trial</title></titleInfo><name><namePart>Ellis, T.</namePart></name><name><namePart>Goede, de C.J.T.</namePart></name><name><namePart>Feldman, R.G.</namePart></name><name><namePart>Wolters, E.C.M.J.</namePart></name><name><namePart>Kwakkel, G.</namePart></name><name><namePart>Wagenaar, R.C.</namePart></name><accessCondition></accessCondition><location><url>http://hdl.handle.net/1871/30790</url></location><language><languageTerm type="text">null</languageTerm></language><genre authority="local">journalArticle</genre><abstract>OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of a physical therapy (PT) program in groups of people with Parkinson&apos;s disease (PD). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with a crossover design. SETTING: Two outpatient rehabilitation clinics in Boston and Amsterdam, respectively. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-eight subjects diagnosed with typical, idiopathic PD, Hoehn and Yahr stage II or III, and stable medication use. INTERVENTION: Group A received PT and medication therapy (MT) for the first 6 weeks, followed by MT only for the second 6 weeks. Group B received only MT for the first 6 weeks and PT and MT for the second 6 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Sickness Impact Profile (SIP-68), the mobility portion of the SIP-68, the Unified Parkinson&apos;s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), and comfortable walking speed (CWS) at baseline, 6-week, 12-week, and 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: At 6 weeks, differences between groups were significant for the SIP mobility ( P =.015; effect size [ES]=.55), for CWS ( P =.012; ES=.49), for the activities of daily living (ADL) section of the UPDRS ( P =.014; ES=.45), and for the total UPDRS ( P =.007; ES=.56). The total SIP and the mentation and motor sections of the UPDRS did not differ significantly between groups. Significant differences were found at 3 months compared with baseline for CWS, the UPDRS ADL, and total scores. CONCLUSIONS: People with PD derive benefits in the short term from PT group treatment, in addition to their MT, for quality of life related to mobility, CWS, and ADLs; long-term benefits were found in CWS, UPDRS ADL, and total scores but varied between groups</abstract></mods>
